Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Stojcevski [2013] NSWSC 1612
Leave is granted to file the Second Further Amended Defence as the relevant issues have long been raised and the amendment will not cause prejudice or delay, but leave is refused for the cross-claim due to lack of expedition, inadequate explanation for delay, and undue prejudice to the Plaintiff by vacating the hearing date.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to File Amended Defence and Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Partial grant of application
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'amendment of Defence' 'leave to File Cross Claim' 'joinder of Parties' 'delay' 'prejudice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to File Amended Defence and Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether leave should be granted to file a Second Further Amended Defence' 'whether leave should be granted to file a cross-claim and join new parties']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is granted to file the Second Further Amended Defence as the relevant issues have long been raised and the amendment will not cause prejudice or delay, but leave is refused for the cross-claim due to lack of expedition, inadequate explanation for delay, and undue prejudice to the Plaintiff by vacating the hearing date.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of application
Orders
- ['Leave to First Defendant to file Second Further Amended Defence in the form attached to the Notice of Motion, to be filed by 12 November 2013.' 'Notice of Motion otherwise dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment