Perrett v Robinson [1988] HCA 41

Perrett v Robinson [1988] HCA 41

Section 41(3) of the Motor Accidents (Compensation) Act 1979 (NT) does not override or expand the limitation on heads of damage contained in s. 5; actions brought at the direction of the Territory Insurance Office remain restricted to those damages permitted by s. 5—namely, damages for pain and suffering or loss of amenities of life. This outcome is also dictated by the law applicable to interstate torts per the approach in Breavington v. Godleman.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / High Court of Australia—determination of Special Leave and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Application for special leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['choice of Law' 'motor Vehicle Accident Compensation' 'scope of Damages' 'no Fault Schemes' 'statutory Interpretation']
['conflict of Laws' 'motor Accident Compensation'] ['choice of Law' 'motor Vehicle Accident Compensation' 'scope of Damages' 'no Fault Schemes' 'statutory Interpretation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Special Leave to Appeal / High Court of Australia—determination of Special Leave and Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether s. 41(3) of the Motor Accidents (Compensation) Act 1979 (NT) removes the limitation of damages imposed by s. 5 upon a resident's right of recovery" 'What law determines the scope of damages in actions commenced outside the Northern Territory for an accident occurring within the Territory involving a Territory resident' 'Whether the applicant can recover damages for loss of earnings or only for pain and suffering/loss of amenities of life when action is required under s. 41(3)']

Ratio Decidendi

Section 41(3) of the Motor Accidents (Compensation) Act 1979 (NT) does not override or expand the limitation on heads of damage contained in s. 5; actions brought at the direction of the Territory Insurance Office remain restricted to those damages permitted by s. 5—namely, damages for pain and suffering or loss of amenities of life. This outcome is also dictated by the law applicable to interstate torts per the approach in Breavington v. Godleman.

Court Disposition

Application for special leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Special leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed' "Appellant to pay the respondent's costs"]