Perry Properties Pty Ltd v Ashfield Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 188
A fear or concern without rational or justified foundation is not sufficient to constitute a social impact under s79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act; in the absence of evidence supporting concerns about inappropriate or anti-social behaviour, refusal based solely on widespread unsubstantiated fear is an error of law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Section 56 a Appeal / Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'public Interest' 'social Impact' 'brothel Licensing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Section 56 a Appeal / Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether widespread adverse community reaction based on unsubstantiated fear is sufficient to constitute social impact justifying refusal of a brothel development application' 'Whether the Commissioner erred in law by refusing consent based on perception of offence after finding no tangible amenity impact']
Ratio Decidendi
A fear or concern without rational or justified foundation is not sufficient to constitute a social impact under s79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act; in the absence of evidence supporting concerns about inappropriate or anti-social behaviour, refusal based solely on widespread unsubstantiated fear is an error of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal be upheld' 'The proceedings be referred to Commissioner Bly' 'The exhibits be returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment