Pertama Development Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2025] NSWLEC 1036

Pertama Development Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2025] NSWLEC 1036

The proposed development does not meet key objectives (a), (d), and (e) of the height standard in North Sydney LEP 2013 cl 4.3: it fails to conform to and reflect the site's landform, has adverse view, privacy, and amenity impacts on adjacent properties, and is not compatible at the zone interface; therefore, the preconditions for granting a variation under cl 4.6 are not met and the development application is refused.

Parties
Applicant: Pertama Development Pty Ltd; Respondent: North Sydney Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; development application refused; costs thrown away payable by Applicant.
Legal Topics
Development Application Refusal, Variation of Development Standards, Building Height Control, Amenity Impacts, Zoning Interface, Planning Principles
Planning and Environment Law Development Application Refusal Variation of Development Standards Building Height Control Amenity Impacts Zoning Interface Planning Principles

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pertama Development Pty Ltd

Applicant

North Sydney Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the variation to the maximum height of building standard should be upheld
  2. 2 Whether the proposed development achieves the objectives of the height standard under North Sydney LEP 2013, cl 4.3
  3. 3 Whether the view, privacy, and amenity impacts are acceptable

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed development does not meet key objectives (a), (d), and (e) of the height standard in North Sydney LEP 2013 cl 4.3: it fails to conform to and reflect the site's landform, has adverse view, privacy, and amenity impacts on adjacent properties, and is not compatible at the zone interface; therefore, the preconditions for granting a variation under cl 4.6 are not met and the development application is refused.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; development application refused; costs thrown away payable by Applicant.

Orders

  • The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application for development consent pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed.
  • The appeal is dismissed.