Howe v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (GD) (No 2) [2005] NSWADTAP 4

Howe v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (GD) (No 2) [2005] NSWADTAP 4

The appeal had been dismissed, the Appellant filed no submissions on costs despite being invited to do so, and the merits strongly supported the Respondent's application for costs; therefore the Appellant was ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed for the specified period.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal Panel Costs Decision / Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Costs ordered against the Appellant.
Legal Topics
['costs of Appeal' 'veterinary Surgeons Disciplinary Proceedings' 'professional Misconduct']
['administrative Law' 'professional Discipline' 'costs'] ['costs of Appeal' 'veterinary Surgeons Disciplinary Proceedings' 'professional Misconduct']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Panel Costs Decision / Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Appellant should pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal had been dismissed, the Appellant filed no submissions on costs despite being invited to do so, and the merits strongly supported the Respondent's application for costs; therefore the Appellant was ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed for the specified period.

Court Disposition

Costs ordered against the Appellant.

Orders

  • ["The Appellant to pay the costs of the Respondent of the appeal as agreed or assessed from the date of filing the Appellant's original Notice of Appeal (22 May 2003) to the 9 February 2004"]