Haertsch v Channel Nine Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] NSWSC 182
The jury found that the broadcast conveyed defamatory imputations about the plaintiff, which were not established as substantially true; the conduct of the defendants in editing and presenting the programme, as well as specific actions during litigation, was improper and aggravated the harm; the plaintiff suffered compensable non-economic loss and a modest quantum for economic loss due to lost referrals; damages assessed having regard to the nature and seriousness of the imputation and harm, with aggravated damages appropriate due to the defendants' unjustifiable conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Judgment After Trial With Jury
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants
- Legal Topics
- ['defamation' 'damages' 'aggravated Damages' 'economic Loss']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Judgment After Trial With Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the broadcast was defamatory of the plaintiff' 'Whether defences of truth or contextual truth under Defamation Act 2005 were established' 'Whether aggravated damages are available' 'Whether damages for economic loss are available']
Ratio Decidendi
The jury found that the broadcast conveyed defamatory imputations about the plaintiff, which were not established as substantially true; the conduct of the defendants in editing and presenting the programme, as well as specific actions during litigation, was improper and aggravated the harm; the plaintiff suffered compensable non-economic loss and a modest quantum for economic loss due to lost referrals; damages assessed having regard to the nature and seriousness of the imputation and harm, with aggravated damages appropriate due to the defendants' unjustifiable conduct.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants
Orders
- ['Damages awarded for non-economic loss in the amount of $251,700' 'Damages awarded for economic loss in the amount of $15,000' 'Interest on non-economic loss at 3% per annum, amounting to $11,700' 'Interest on economic loss at 5% per annum, amounting to $1,219' 'Total judgment sum $267,919']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment