Walsh v University of Technology, Sydney (No 2) [2007] FCA 1042
Costs should follow the event as there are no circumstances justifying a departure from the ordinary rule; the respondent is entitled to its costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment (costs)
- Outcome
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the proceedings, including the notice of motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'discretion in Awarding Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment (costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event or be otherwise ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should follow the event as there are no circumstances justifying a departure from the ordinary rule; the respondent is entitled to its costs.
Court Disposition
Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the proceedings, including the notice of motion.
Orders
- ["The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings, including the notice of motion filed on 9 March 2007."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment