Peter Blake v Ku-ring-gai Council [2017] NSWLEC 1102
The Court, being satisfied that the decision reached by agreement is one it could have made, is required by s 34(3)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision. Consequently, the appeal is upheld, and development consent is granted subject to conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Blake; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Conciliation Conference Orders Following Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; agreement between parties given effect to
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Consent Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Blake
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Conciliation Conference Orders Following Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a decision disposed of by consent under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 can be made by the Court
- 2 Whether development consent should be granted in accordance with parties' agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied that the decision reached by agreement is one it could have made, is required by s 34(3)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision. Consequently, the appeal is upheld, and development consent is granted subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; agreement between parties given effect to
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documents referred to in Condition 1 at Annexure A to this agreement.
- Pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), the respondent's costs thrown away in the total amount of $5,000, by 5.00pm on 23 February 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment