Peter Campton v Parramatta City Council [2011] NSWLEC 1360
The appeal was upheld because the proposed subdivision and associated works complied with relevant numerical planning controls, were consistent with the residential zone objectives, would not have unacceptable impacts on the conservation area, streetscape, neighbouring amenity or public interest, and adequately addressed ecological, arboricultural and drainage concerns once amended Vegetation Management Plan, site-specific Tree Protection Plan, revised conditions, driveway details and positive covenants were provided to the Court's satisfaction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under S 97(1) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application Da/676/2010 / Final Orders; Appeal Upheld and Development Application Approved Subject to Conditions
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld subject to conditions; Development Application DA/676/2010 approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['subdivision Into 3 Allotments' 'tree Removal' 'concrete Access Way and Drainage Network' 'impact on Streetscape and Conservation Area' 'endangered Ecological Community' 'vegetation Management Plan' 'tree Protection Plan' 'stormwater Drainage' 'private Open Space']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under S 97(1) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application Da/676/2010 / Final Orders; Appeal Upheld and Development Application Approved Subject to Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proposed 3 lot subdivision, access way, drainage works and tree removal should be approved despite council's deemed refusal." 'Whether the proposal was consistent with the relevant objectives and controls in Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2001, Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 1996 (Heritage and Conservation), Development Control Plan 2005, Parramatta Heritage Development Control Plan 2001 and draft planning instruments.' 'Whether the proposal would adversely affect the Epping-Eastwood Conservation Area, the predominant subdivision pattern, streetscape character or amenity of neighbouring properties.' 'Whether the proposal adequately protected Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest and retained Grey Ironbark trees through the Vegetation Management Plan, Tree Protection Plan and conditions.' 'Whether the proposed private open space, driveway treatment and stormwater drainage arrangements were acceptable.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was upheld because the proposed subdivision and associated works complied with relevant numerical planning controls, were consistent with the residential zone objectives, would not have unacceptable impacts on the conservation area, streetscape, neighbouring amenity or public interest, and adequately addressed ecological, arboricultural and drainage concerns once amended Vegetation Management Plan, site-specific Tree Protection Plan, revised conditions, driveway details and positive covenants were provided to the Court's satisfaction.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld subject to conditions; Development Application DA/676/2010 approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
Orders
- ['Appeal number 10868 of 2010 is upheld.' 'Development Application DA/676/2010 for tree removal, construction of a concrete access way, drainage network and subdivision into 3 allotments of 54 Epping Avenue Epping (Lot 45 DP 5792) is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'All exhibits except 1 and B are...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment