Cao v Regina; Phan v Regina; Nguyen v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 273
The sentencing judge’s approximation of the quantity of heroin imported was within the range supported by the evidence and submissions on which the sentencing was based; the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive given the applicants’ senior roles in the conspiracy; there was no marked disparity between the applicants and their co-offenders such as to give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance. Leave to appeal is granted but all appeals are dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'conspiracy to Import Drugs' 'factual Disputes in Sentencing' 'parity of Sentences' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentencing judge overstated the quantity of heroin imported' 'Whether sentences were manifestly excessive' 'Whether there was a lack of parity between sentences imposed on co-offenders']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge’s approximation of the quantity of heroin imported was within the range supported by the evidence and submissions on which the sentencing was based; the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive given the applicants’ senior roles in the conspiracy; there was no marked disparity between the applicants and their co-offenders such as to give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance. Leave to appeal is granted but all appeals are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeals dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment