Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7
There was no error in the exercise of discretion by the sentencing judge in fixing the non-parole period for the ecstasy offence; the period was intended, justified, and did not warrant appellate intervention.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'special Circumstances in Sentencing' 'non Parole Period Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sufficient weight was given to the finding of special circumstances in fixing the non-parole period for the ecstasy offence']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in the exercise of discretion by the sentencing judge in fixing the non-parole period for the ecstasy offence; the period was intended, justified, and did not warrant appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal be refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment