Carr v Darren Berry International Marine Pty Ltd (No 1) [2013] FCA 1150
Appointment of provisional liquidators was warranted due to the strong prospect of a winding up order, presumption of insolvency, significant risk of asset dissipation, and impracticality of ordinary procedure given potential fraud and asset mobility.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Winding Up Application / Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidator, Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Provisional liquidators appointed ex parte to the first defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Provisional Liquidator' 'winding Up Proceedings' 'statutory Demand' 'insolvency' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Winding Up Application / Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidator, Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether provisional liquidators should be appointed to the first defendant' 'Whether there is a risk assets are being dissipated warranting urgent appointment' 'Whether the balance of convenience supports ex parte orders']
Ratio Decidendi
Appointment of provisional liquidators was warranted due to the strong prospect of a winding up order, presumption of insolvency, significant risk of asset dissipation, and impracticality of ordinary procedure given potential fraud and asset mobility.
Court Disposition
Provisional liquidators appointed ex parte to the first defendant.
Orders
- ['Mr Darren John Vardy and Mr Terry Grant van der Velde appointed joint and several provisional liquidators of Darren Berry International Marine Pty Ltd.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment