Chen v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2007] NSWLEC 867
The existing 2.25 m vehicular gate was not acceptable in the present streetscape setting, but because the gate was set back significantly from the street and the surrounding fencing and gating arrangements were varied, a reduction to 1.8 m was unnecessarily severe; a maximum height of 1.95 m was appropriate and a longer compliance period should be allowed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Pursuant to S 101 ZK of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against an Order Issued Under S 121 B of the Act / Extempore Judgment
- Outcome
- The order issued on 18 June 2007 was set aside and substituted with a modified order.
- Legal Topics
- ['s 121 B Order' 'gate Height' 'streetscape Impact' 'development Control Plan']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Pursuant to S 101 ZK of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against an Order Issued Under S 121 B of the Act / Extempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Council's order requiring removal of portions of metal grille gates above a specified height should be upheld or varied." 'What height was appropriate for the metal vehicular gate and associated post in the streetscape context of the premises.']
Ratio Decidendi
The existing 2.25 m vehicular gate was not acceptable in the present streetscape setting, but because the gate was set back significantly from the street and the surrounding fencing and gating arrangements were varied, a reduction to 1.8 m was unnecessarily severe; a maximum height of 1.95 m was appropriate and a longer compliance period should be allowed.
Court Disposition
The order issued on 18 June 2007 was set aside and substituted with a modified order.
Orders
- ['Reduce the height of the metal vehicular gate and associated post on the southern end of the existing gate to no more than 1.95 metres above ground level at its present location.' 'The period for compliance with the order is amended to 120 days from the date of the formal orders being issued by the Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment