Countouris v Kallos [2007] NSWSC 944
Direct evidence from the alleged signatories is preferable to handwriting expert evidence when those signatories are available, and affidavits or oral testimony from them should be sought before resorting to expert evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (interlocutory Application) / Adjournment/postponement of Hearing for Expert Evidence
- Outcome
- Hearing before Expert Evidence Judge postponed; timetable made for parties to obtain affidavits or other direct evidence.
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'handwriting Evidence' 'proxy Authenticity' 'leave to Adduce Expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (interlocutory Application) / Adjournment/postponement of Hearing for Expert Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to adduce expert handwriting evidence when witnesses to the signatures are available']
Ratio Decidendi
Direct evidence from the alleged signatories is preferable to handwriting expert evidence when those signatories are available, and affidavits or oral testimony from them should be sought before resorting to expert evidence.
Court Disposition
Hearing before Expert Evidence Judge postponed; timetable made for parties to obtain affidavits or other direct evidence.
Orders
- ['The hearing before the Expert Evidence Judge is postponed until after 17 September 2007.' 'Time for the defendants to file evidence is fixed at 4 pm on 17 September 2007.' "Motion adjourned to the Expert Evidence Judge's list at 9 am on 19 September 2007 with liberty to apply on two days' notice to the Duty Judge."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment