Schiff v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 1120
The '60 Minutes' broadcast conveyed several pleaded defamatory imputations against Schiff as alleged in the statement of claim, due to its tone, sequencing, and overall impression, whereas the related article employed qualified, careful language and investigative context, and thus did not convey any of the pleaded imputations.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter David Schiff; First Respondent: Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: The Age Company Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Nicholas McKenzie; Fourth Respondent: Charlotte Grieve; Fifth Respondent: Joel Tozer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Determination of Separate Questions; Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Broadcast carried defamatory imputations; Article did not carry pleaded imputations.
- Legal Topics
- Defamatory Meanings, Contextual Imputations, Media Publications, Qualified Privilege, Broadcasts Vs Print Articles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter David Schiff
Applicant
Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd
First Respondent
The Age Company Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Nicholas McKenzie
Third Respondent
Charlotte Grieve
Fourth Respondent
Joel Tozer
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Determination of Separate Questions; Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TV broadcast and/or article conveyed pleaded defamatory imputations
- 2 Whether alleged imputations are defamatory
- 3 Whether publication conveys contextual imputations in addition to pleaded imputations
Ratio Decidendi
The '60 Minutes' broadcast conveyed several pleaded defamatory imputations against Schiff as alleged in the statement of claim, due to its tone, sequencing, and overall impression, whereas the related article employed qualified, careful language and investigative context, and thus did not convey any of the pleaded imputations.
Court Disposition
Broadcast carried defamatory imputations; Article did not carry pleaded imputations.
Orders
- The separate questions contained in annexure A of the orders of 1 June 2022 be answered as set out in the reasons for judgment published today.
- The parties are to confer and, within seven days, are to submit agreed or competing proposed orders for the future conduct of the matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment