Schiff v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 658

Schiff v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 658

Although the ordinary course is to try all issues together, the large number of imputations pleaded and denied, the assumption that the denials were seriously maintained and had reasonable prospects, the obvious capacity for substantial saving in time and cost if the denials were upheld, the real capacity to simplify any ultimate hearing, and the possibility of assisting further resolution justified ordering that the proposed questions be determined separately from and in advance of all other questions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Defamation Proceeding / Interlocutory Application Dated 2 May 2022 for Separate and Prior Determination of Proposed Questions
Outcome
Order made for the proposed separate questions to be determined separately from and in advance of all other issues in the proceeding.
Legal Topics
['separate Determination of Questions' 'defamatory Imputations' 'natural and Ordinary Meaning' 'contextual Imputations' 'overarching Purpose and Costs']
['practice and Procedure' 'defamation'] ['separate Determination of Questions' 'defamatory Imputations' 'natural and Ordinary Meaning' 'contextual Imputations' 'overarching Purpose and Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Defamation Proceeding / Interlocutory Application Dated 2 May 2022 for Separate and Prior Determination of Proposed Questions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the proposed separate questions concerning the pleaded defamatory imputations and respondents' meanings should be determined separately from and in advance of all other issues in the proceeding." 'Whether separate determination had capacity to produce a substantial saving in time and cost, simplify any ultimate hearing, and assist possible resolution of the proceeding.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the ordinary course is to try all issues together, the large number of imputations pleaded and denied, the assumption that the denials were seriously maintained and had reasonable prospects, the obvious capacity for substantial saving in time and cost if the denials were upheld, the real capacity to simplify any ultimate hearing, and the possibility of assisting further resolution justified ordering that the proposed questions be determined separately from and in advance of all other questions.

Court Disposition

Order made for the proposed separate questions to be determined separately from and in advance of all other issues in the proceeding.

Orders

  • ['The questions proposed for separate determination as set out in Annexure A to this order (separate questions) be determined separately from and in advance of all other issues in the proceeding.' 'Paragraphs 2–6 of the interlocutory application dated 2 May 2022 be adjourned pending the determination of the separate...