Re Dawson, P. v. Ex parte Dawson, P. & Anor [1985] FCA 116

Re Dawson, P. v. Ex parte Dawson, P. & Anor [1985] FCA 116

The issue of a bankruptcy notice after a deed of assignment under Part X has become binding constitutes commencement of legal proceedings under s.228(2)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and is consequently not competent unless and until the deed is declared void.

Parties
Applicant: Peter Dawson; Respondents: Arthur Andersen and Co. (a firm)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 March 1985
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Setting Aside of Bankruptcy Notice
Outcome
Application granted. Bankruptcy Notice set aside.
Legal Topics
Deed of Assignment Under Part X, Bankruptcy Notice, Voidness of Deed

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Dawson

Applicant

Arthur Andersen and Co. (a firm)

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Application / Setting Aside of Bankruptcy Notice

  1. 1 Whether issuing a bankruptcy notice is competent before a declaration that the deed of assignment is void under Part X
  2. 2 Whether issue of bankruptcy notice constitutes commencement of legal proceedings under s.228(2)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
  3. 3 Whether a deed is treated as binding until declared void

Ratio Decidendi

The issue of a bankruptcy notice after a deed of assignment under Part X has become binding constitutes commencement of legal proceedings under s.228(2)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and is consequently not competent unless and until the deed is declared void.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Bankruptcy Notice set aside.

Orders

  • Bankruptcy Notice No. 2 of 1985 is set aside.
  • Respondents pay the costs of and incidental to this application, to be taxed.