Re Dawson, P. v. Ex parte Dawson, P. & Anor [1985] FCA 116
The issue of a bankruptcy notice after a deed of assignment under Part X has become binding constitutes commencement of legal proceedings under s.228(2)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and is consequently not competent unless and until the deed is declared void.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Dawson; Respondents: Arthur Andersen and Co. (a firm)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Setting Aside of Bankruptcy Notice
- Outcome
- Application granted. Bankruptcy Notice set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Deed of Assignment Under Part X, Bankruptcy Notice, Voidness of Deed
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Dawson
Applicant
Arthur Andersen and Co. (a firm)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Setting Aside of Bankruptcy Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether issuing a bankruptcy notice is competent before a declaration that the deed of assignment is void under Part X
- 2 Whether issue of bankruptcy notice constitutes commencement of legal proceedings under s.228(2)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
- 3 Whether a deed is treated as binding until declared void
Ratio Decidendi
The issue of a bankruptcy notice after a deed of assignment under Part X has become binding constitutes commencement of legal proceedings under s.228(2)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and is consequently not competent unless and until the deed is declared void.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Bankruptcy Notice set aside.
Orders
- Bankruptcy Notice No. 2 of 1985 is set aside.
- Respondents pay the costs of and incidental to this application, to be taxed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment