Gorczynski v Perera & Dee & Ors (No. 3) [2003] NSWLEC 170

The Court determined that Leichhardt Council's grant of two development consents was valid, dismissed the application in proceedings 40208 of 2001, and made costs orders in the related proceedings after reviewing the nature of those proceedings.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 06 February 2003
Procedural Posture: Land and Environment Court Proceedings Concerning Validity of Development Consents and Costs / Ex Tempore Judgment and Costs Orders
Outcome: Application in proceedings 40208 of 2001 dismissed; costs orders made in proceedings 40208 of 2001, 40012 of 2000, 30079 of 2000 and 40120 of 2000.
Legal Topics: ['validity of Development Consents' 'costs Orders' 'reserved Costs']

['planning and Environment Law' 'costs'] ['validity of Development Consents' 'costs Orders' 'reserved Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Court Proceedings Concerning Validity of Development Consents and Costs / Ex Tempore Judgment and Costs Orders

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether Leichhardt Council's grant of two development consents was valid." 'What costs orders should be made in proceedings 40208 of 2001, 40120 of 2000, 40012 of 2000 and 30079 of 2000.']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application in proceedings 40208 of 2001 dismissed; costs orders made in proceedings 40208 of 2001, 40012 of 2000, 30079 of 2000 and 40120 of 2000.

Orders

['In proceedings 40208 of 2001, the application be dismissed.' 'In proceedings 40208 of 2001, the applicant pay the costs including the reserved costs of each of the respondents.' 'In proceedings 40208 of 2001, the exhibits be returned.' 'In proceedings 40012 of 2000, no order for costs be made as between the...