Miller & Anor v Harris (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 44

Miller & Anor v Harris (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 44

Because the Court was satisfied that Mr Harris had been properly informed of the hearing date and the relief sought, and because the plaintiffs sought judgment only for the principal amount and did not pursue interest or costs, judgment was entered against Mr Harris for $106,992.76.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 February 2014
Procedural Posture
Costs / Ex Tempore Judgment Following Earlier Judgment for the Plaintiffs
Outcome
Judgment entered for the plaintiffs.
Legal Topics
['entry of Judgment' 'interest and Costs' 'notice of Hearing' 'non Appearance']
['costs'] ['entry of Judgment' 'interest and Costs' 'notice of Hearing' 'non Appearance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Costs / Ex Tempore Judgment Following Earlier Judgment for the Plaintiffs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether judgment should be entered for the plaintiffs for the principal amount only, where the plaintiffs no longer sought interest and costs.' 'Whether the defendant had been properly informed of the hearing date and the relief sought.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the Court was satisfied that Mr Harris had been properly informed of the hearing date and the relief sought, and because the plaintiffs sought judgment only for the principal amount and did not pursue interest or costs, judgment was entered against Mr Harris for $106,992.76.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the plaintiffs.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for $106,992.76 against the defendant, Mr Harris.']