Clark v Robards [2015] NSWCA 140
Leave to appeal was granted against the primary judge's dismissal of causes of action from the 2005 pleading (other than Part A, par 10, conspiracy charge) because the reasoning based on delay was arguably unjustified given the procedural context; global dismissal was inappropriate given arguable cases remained on foot.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted in part; application otherwise dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['pleading' 'summary Dismissal' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'abuse of Process' 'want of Due Despatch']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted against summary dismissal for want of due despatch' 'Appropriateness of global dismissal based on delay when older proceedings remain on foot' 'Whether specific causes of action in amended pleadings disclose arguable cases']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted against the primary judge's dismissal of causes of action from the 2005 pleading (other than Part A, par 10, conspiracy charge) because the reasoning based on delay was arguably unjustified given the procedural context; global dismissal was inappropriate given arguable cases remained on foot.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted in part; application otherwise dismissed
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal against so much of the judgment as dismissed paragraphs of the proposed amended statement of claim which dealt with causes of action to be found in the 2005 pleading, other than conspiracy charge (Part A, par 10), considered by Harrison J in June 2010' 'Otherwise dismiss the summons seeking...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment