Clark v State of New South Wales; The Commissioner of Corrective Services v Clark [2016] NSWSC 157
The claims concerning charges for printing, photocopying and folders and the loss of computer classroom access substantially duplicated relief and allegations already being litigated in related Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) proceedings, with no significant difference in supporting material, so those parts of the amended summons were an abuse of process and had to be struck out. The shower-use claim, although supported by exiguous and poorly articulated material, was sufficiently clear for present purposes and was not pressed by the Commissioner as liable to be struck out, so it was allowed to proceed subject to particulars and a defence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Proceeding Concerning Prisoner Access to Courts and Administrative Decisions by Corrective Services Officers / Procedural Ruling on Amended Summons and Third Defendant's Motion to Strike Out Relief
- Outcome
- Leave to amend the summons was granted; paragraphs 1 to 8 of the amended summons claiming relief were struck out; the remaining shower-use claim was allowed to proceed as a particular in a statement of claim; directions were made for particulars, defence and further listing; the plaintiff was ordered to pay the...
- Legal Topics
- ['prisoner Access to Courts' 'supervisory Jurisdiction' 'abuse of Process' 'strike Out' 'particulars' 'felons Civil Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Proceeding Concerning Prisoner Access to Courts and Administrative Decisions by Corrective Services Officers / Procedural Ruling on Amended Summons and Third Defendant's Motion to Strike Out Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether parts of the amended summons duplicated matters already being litigated in proceedings under the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) and should be struck out as an abuse of process.' "Whether the plaintiff's claim concerning limits on use of the shower in his cell should be struck out or left to trial." 'Whether the proceedings should continue by treating the remaining relief as a particular in a statement of claim with further and better particulars and a defence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The claims concerning charges for printing, photocopying and folders and the loss of computer classroom access substantially duplicated relief and allegations already being litigated in related Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) proceedings, with no significant difference in supporting material, so those parts of the amended summons were an abuse of process and had to be struck out. The shower-use claim, although supported by exiguous and poorly articulated material, was sufficiently clear for present purposes and was not pressed by the Commissioner as liable to be struck out, so it was allowed to proceed subject to particulars and a defence.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend the summons was granted; paragraphs 1 to 8 of the amended summons claiming relief were struck out; the remaining shower-use claim was allowed to proceed as a particular in a statement of claim; directions were made for particulars, defence and further listing; the plaintiff was ordered to pay the...
Orders
- ['Leave to amend summons granted.' 'Paragraphs 1 to 8 of the amended summons claiming relief struck out.' 'The relief sought in paragraph 9 of the amended summons to be treated as a particular in a statement of a claim.' 'The Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW to seek further and better particulars on or before...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment