Clark v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 271
The application was dismissed because it simply sought to re-litigate issues already decided adversely to the applicant in previous proceedings, there was no reason to doubt the correctness of those judgments, and the application was vexatious.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Application Under R 50 C of the Criminal Appeal Rules 1912 (nsw) / Application on the Papers to Set Aside a Judgment Refusing an Application to Set Aside a Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['criminal Appeal' 'r 50 C Criminal Appeal Rules' 'application to Set Aside Judgment' 'vexatious Application' 'child Sexual Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Application Under R 50 C of the Criminal Appeal Rules 1912 (nsw) / Application on the Papers to Set Aside a Judgment Refusing an Application to Set Aside a Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should set aside its judgment of 6 October 2015 in Clark v R [2015] NSWCCA 265 under r 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules.' "Whether the applicant's renewed challenge to his conviction for aggravated sexual intercourse with child between 14-16 under s 66C(4) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) raised any matter warranting reconsideration."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because it simply sought to re-litigate issues already decided adversely to the applicant in previous proceedings, there was no reason to doubt the correctness of those judgments, and the application was vexatious.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment