Gregg v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 440

Gregg v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 440

Because the criminal charges and Fairfax's pleaded justification defence substantially overlapped, continuation of the civil proceedings would create a real risk of prejudice to Mr Gregg's defence of the criminal proceedings and to the administration of justice. Although the Court had power to impose conditions on a stay, Fairfax did not establish that access to subpoenaed documents or further production by ASIC was necessary or in the interests of justice; allowing such access would be antithetical to the purpose of the stay and could have unintended impacts on the criminal proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation Proceedings With Concurrent Criminal Proceedings Involving the Applicant / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Civil Proceedings Pending Determination of Criminal Proceedings
Outcome
Application for stay granted; Fairfax's requested conditions for access to documents and further production were refused; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['stay of Proceedings' 'concurrent Civil and Criminal Proceedings' 'risk of Prejudice to Criminal Defence' 'privilege Against Self Incrimination' 'subpoenas and Access to Produced Documents' 'implied Undertaking' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders']
['practice and Procedure' 'defamation' 'corporations Law' 'criminal Procedure'] ['stay of Proceedings' 'concurrent Civil and Criminal Proceedings' 'risk of Prejudice to Criminal Defence' 'privilege Against Self Incrimination' 'subpoenas and Access to Produced Documents' 'implied Undertaking' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Defamation Proceedings With Concurrent Criminal Proceedings Involving the Applicant / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Civil Proceedings Pending Determination of Criminal Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the civil proceedings should be stayed until determination of the criminal proceedings against the applicant.' 'Whether Fairfax should be granted access to documents produced by ASIC and PwC while the proceedings are stayed.' 'Whether ASIC should be compelled to produce further documents comprising the prosecution brief during the stay.' 'Whether conditions on the stay were necessary or in the interests of justice.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the criminal charges and Fairfax's pleaded justification defence substantially overlapped, continuation of the civil proceedings would create a real risk of prejudice to Mr Gregg's defence of the criminal proceedings and to the administration of justice. Although the Court had power to impose conditions on a stay, Fairfax did not establish that access to subpoenaed documents or further production by ASIC was necessary or in the interests of justice; allowing such access would be antithetical to the purpose of the stay and could have unintended impacts on the criminal proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application for stay granted; Fairfax's requested conditions for access to documents and further production were refused; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ['The proceedings be stayed until the determination of the proceedings in the Local Court of New South Wales and on any indictment brought in respect of those proceedings the subject of Court Attendance Notice in criminal proceedings 2257/2017 commenced by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission on 9...