Woods, P.G. & Ors v H & R Block Inc. & Ors [1995] FCA 392
The notice to produce is set aside due to lack of clarity and ambiguity, particularly in its paragraphs. The court directs further discovery, requiring the first respondent to make a thorough search and file a further affidavit of discovery.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Notice to produce set aside; direction for further discovery; costs order made in favour of the first respondent, subject to argument.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'notice to Produce' 'affidavits']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicants' notice to produce should be set aside" 'Adequacy of discovery by the first respondent']
Ratio Decidendi
The notice to produce is set aside due to lack of clarity and ambiguity, particularly in its paragraphs. The court directs further discovery, requiring the first respondent to make a thorough search and file a further affidavit of discovery.
Court Disposition
Notice to produce set aside; direction for further discovery; costs order made in favour of the first respondent, subject to argument.
Orders
- ['Notice to produce dated 5 April 1995 set aside.' 'First respondent to file a further affidavit of discovery on or before 11 May.' "Costs of the motion to be the first respondent's costs in the proceeding, subject to counsels' argument."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment