Macks, In the matter of Addstone Pty Ltd (in liq) [2000] FCA 205

Macks, In the matter of Addstone Pty Ltd (in liq) [2000] FCA 205

The Federal Court lacks jurisdiction to proceed further in the winding up matters concerning the Emanuel Group by virtue of the High Court's decision in Re Wakim and its interpretation in Edensor Nominees. The proper course is to stay the proceedings for want of jurisdiction to enable transfer to an appropriate Supreme Court under State legislation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 March 2000
Procedural Posture
Liquidation Proceedings / Application for Order Regarding Jurisdiction
Outcome
Proceedings stayed for want of jurisdiction, with stay of orders for 14 days and liberty to apply.
Legal Topics
['winding Up' 'jurisdiction' 'corporations Law' 'stay of Proceedings']
['corporations Law' 'federal Jurisdiction'] ['winding Up' 'jurisdiction' 'corporations Law' 'stay of Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Liquidation Proceedings / Application for Order Regarding Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to deal with the winding up proceedings of the Emanuel Group of companies after the High Court's decision in Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally" 'Whether orders should be made staying the proceedings for want of jurisdiction']

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Court lacks jurisdiction to proceed further in the winding up matters concerning the Emanuel Group by virtue of the High Court's decision in Re Wakim and its interpretation in Edensor Nominees. The proper course is to stay the proceedings for want of jurisdiction to enable transfer to an appropriate Supreme Court under State legislation.

Court Disposition

Proceedings stayed for want of jurisdiction, with stay of orders for 14 days and liberty to apply.

Orders

  • ['These proceedings and each of the proceedings referenced in Schedule A to the affidavit of Mr Macks sworn 10 November 1999 in Matter SG 3076 of 1995 be stayed for want of jurisdiction.' "The orders are stayed for a period of fourteen days from today's date, or such further period as the Court may order upon...