R v Holland [2002] NSWCCA 469

R v Holland [2002] NSWCCA 469

The appeal was dismissed because the jury's verdicts were rationally distinguishable based on evidence for each count, directions to the jury were properly given, especially concerning withdrawal of consent and credibility, and admissibility/use of the taped conversations was appropriate. No miscarriage of justice occurred.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal against convictions dismissed
Legal Topics
['aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'attempted Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'assault With Acts of Indecency' 'inconsistent Verdicts' 'directions to Jury' 'credibility' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'withdrawal of Consent']
['criminal Law'] ['aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'attempted Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'assault With Acts of Indecency' 'inconsistent Verdicts' 'directions to Jury' 'credibility' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'withdrawal of Consent']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether verdicts were inconsistent and thus unreasonable' 'Adequacy of jury directions regarding doubt as to credibility' 'Admissibility and use of tape recorded telephone conversations as evidence of lack of consent' 'Whether proper directions were given regarding telephone call evidence' 'Whether the jury was properly instructed on the withdrawal of consent during sexual acts']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the jury's verdicts were rationally distinguishable based on evidence for each count, directions to the jury were properly given, especially concerning withdrawal of consent and credibility, and admissibility/use of the taped conversations was appropriate. No miscarriage of justice occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal against convictions dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed']