Davenport, Peter John & Ors v Repatriation Commission [1995] FCA 930
The applicant did not make a clear, informed election to limit the scope of review; consequently, the Board was obliged to review the whole decision of the Commission. The failure to do so constituted a failure to perform the function required by the Act, necessitating that the Board's determination be set aside and the matter remitted for hearing according to law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Order of Review / Judgment (first Instance)
- Outcome
- Decision of the Board set aside, matter remitted to the Board for hearing according to law
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'election of Rights' 'procedural Fairness' 'repatriation Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Order of Review / Judgment (first Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Veterans' Review Board failed to review the whole of the Repatriation Commission's decision as required under s.139(2) of the Veterans' Entitlement Act 1986" "Whether the applicant made an election to only challenge part of the Commission's decision and thereby relieved the Board of its duty under the Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not make a clear, informed election to limit the scope of review; consequently, the Board was obliged to review the whole decision of the Commission. The failure to do so constituted a failure to perform the function required by the Act, necessitating that the Board's determination be set aside and the matter remitted for hearing according to law.
Court Disposition
Decision of the Board set aside, matter remitted to the Board for hearing according to law
Orders
- ['The parties file a minute of appropriate orders in accordance with these reasons' "Decision of the Veterans' Review Board set aside" "Matter returned to the Veterans' Review Board for hearing according to law"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment