Dear v Jarvis [1996] IRCA 245

Dear v Jarvis [1996] IRCA 245

The applicant worked only sporadically and without entitlement to ongoing work or leave, was paid only for actual work performed, and was dependent on work from the respondent's client with no guarantee; thus, he was a casual employee for a short period under Regulation 30B and excluded from the unlawful termination provisions of the Act.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 April 1996
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 170 EA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 / Decision; Judgment on Merits
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['termination of Employment' 'casual Employment' 'jurisdiction' 'unlawful Termination']
['industrial Law' 'employment Law'] ['termination of Employment' 'casual Employment' 'jurisdiction' 'unlawful Termination']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 170 EA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 / Decision; Judgment on Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant was a casual employee for a short period within the meaning of Regulation 30B of the Industrial Relations Regulations' 'Whether the Court had jurisdiction to hear an application for unlawful termination in the circumstances' 'Whether the termination of the applicant’s employment was unlawful']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant worked only sporadically and without entitlement to ongoing work or leave, was paid only for actual work performed, and was dependent on work from the respondent's client with no guarantee; thus, he was a casual employee for a short period under Regulation 30B and excluded from the unlawful termination provisions of the Act.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']