Carr, P.J. v. McDonalds Australia Ltd [1994] FCA 765

Carr, P.J. v. McDonalds Australia Ltd [1994] FCA 765

There was no reasonable apprehension of prejudgment or bias arising from the judge's previous findings on witness credit in the liability phase, especially given the split hearing arrangement and established legal principles that such circumstances do not, without more, warrant disqualification.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 October 1994
Procedural Posture
Motion / Post Liability, Pre Damages Hearing, Motion for Disqualification of Judge
Outcome
Motion for disqualification dismissed; applicant awarded costs of the motion.
Legal Topics
['disqualification of Judge' 'reasonable Apprehension of Prejudgment or Bias' 'split Hearing' 'credit of Witness']
['practice and Procedure'] ['disqualification of Judge' 'reasonable Apprehension of Prejudgment or Bias' 'split Hearing' 'credit of Witness']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion / Post Liability, Pre Damages Hearing, Motion for Disqualification of Judge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the judge should be disqualified for a reasonable apprehension of prejudgment or bias regarding a witness whose credibility was assessed in the liability phase and who will be important in the damages hearing.']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no reasonable apprehension of prejudgment or bias arising from the judge's previous findings on witness credit in the liability phase, especially given the split hearing arrangement and established legal principles that such circumstances do not, without more, warrant disqualification.

Court Disposition

Motion for disqualification dismissed; applicant awarded costs of the motion.

Orders

  • ["Respondent to pay the applicant's costs of the application which was dismissed on 20 September 1994."]