McLachlan v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2018] FCA 1040

McLachlan v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2018] FCA 1040

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear or communicate with the Court, and there was no material before the Court to demonstrate an arguable case for the extension of time or leave to appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Final Determination
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'appeals' 'costs' 'non Appearance of Party']
['administrative Law'] ['extension of Time' 'appeals' 'costs' 'non Appearance of Party']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether the matter should be dismissed for non-appearance and lack of arguable case']

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear or communicate with the Court, and there was no material before the Court to demonstrate an arguable case for the extension of time or leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant do pay the respondent's costs to be assessed if not agreed."]