RICKABY v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 288
The offences of firing a firearm in a public place and possession of an unregistered firearm are distinct; partial accumulation of sentences was within the sentencing judge's discretion, and the principle of totality was not offended, as overall criminality was properly reflected.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Kevine Rickaby; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted. Extension of time for filing application granted.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Totality Principle, Cumulative and Concurrent Sentences, Firearms Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Kevine Rickaby
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred by imposing partially cumulative sentences without regard to commonality of elements between offences
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to have regard to the principle of totality
Ratio Decidendi
The offences of firing a firearm in a public place and possession of an unregistered firearm are distinct; partial accumulation of sentences was within the sentencing judge's discretion, and the principle of totality was not offended, as overall criminality was properly reflected.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted. Extension of time for filing application granted.
Orders
- Extend the time for filing the application for leave to appeal against sentence up to and including 30 May 2007.
- Grant leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment