Lake v Ballina Golf and Sports Club Limited & Anor [2025] NSWCATAP 25
The application for extension of time to commence the appeal was refused due to an extensive delay without satisfactory explanation and absence of merit in grounds of appeal; consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Lake; First Respondent: Ballina Golf and Sports Club Limited; Second Respondent: Golf Australia Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Appeal, Procedural Fairness, Bias Allegations, Australian Consumer Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Lake
Appellant
Ballina Golf and Sports Club Limited
First Respondent
Golf Australia Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant extension of time to commence appeal
- 2 Whether Tribunal decision involved procedural unfairness or bias
- 3 Identification of legal basis for compensation for rendered inactive golf handicap
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time to commence the appeal was refused due to an extensive delay without satisfactory explanation and absence of merit in grounds of appeal; consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for an extension of time in which to commence the appeal is refused.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment