Lakiss v Piangas [2020] NSWLEC 1405
All trees in the row are likely to cause further damage to the applicant's driveway and property in the near future, justifying their removal. The cost of replacing the driveway is not proportionate to the damage and respondents are not ordered to pay for repairs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Lakiss; First Respondent: George Piangas; Second Respondent: Angelo Piangas; Third Respondent: Konnie Piangas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made for removal of all cypress trees adjacent to western boundary; respondents to give notice and bear removal costs; no order for respondents to pay for repairs.
- Legal Topics
- Tree Removal, Neighbour Disputes, Damage to Property, Repair Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Lakiss
Applicant
George Piangas
First Respondent
Angelo Piangas
Second Respondent
Konnie Piangas
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cypress trees on respondents' property caused damage to applicant's driveway and fence
- 2 Whether the trees should be ordered removed
- 3 Whether the respondents should pay for repairs to the applicant's property
Ratio Decidendi
All trees in the row are likely to cause further damage to the applicant's driveway and property in the near future, justifying their removal. The cost of replacing the driveway is not proportionate to the damage and respondents are not ordered to pay for repairs.
Court Disposition
Orders made for removal of all cypress trees adjacent to western boundary; respondents to give notice and bear removal costs; no order for respondents to pay for repairs.
Orders
- Within 30 days, respondents to engage and pay for a qualified arborist to remove all cypress trees in the row adjacent to their western boundary to ground level, per Safe Work Australia Guide.
- Respondents to give applicant at least two days' notice of the works.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment