Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1127
It is not appropriate to order a second mediation given parties' opposition, the complexity of the issues, and unresolved funding concerns; all outstanding issues are stood over to a hearing scheduled for 18 April 2006.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Peter Lawrence Lewis; Applicant: Lamru Pty Ltd; Respondent: Kation Pty Ltd; Liquidator: Brian Raymond Silvia; Defendant: Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Defendant: Mark Lewis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Preliminary Orders; Issues Stood Over for Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Matter not referred compulsorily to mediation; all outstanding issues stood over to fixture commencing on 18 April 2006.
- Legal Topics
- Supreme Court Procedure, Order for Mediation, Power to Order Mediation, Second Mediation After Failed Mediation, Outstanding Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Lawrence Lewis
Plaintiff
Lamru Pty Ltd
Applicant
Kation Pty Ltd
Respondent
Brian Raymond Silvia
Liquidator
Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq)
Defendant
Mark Lewis
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity / Preliminary Orders; Issues Stood Over for Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should order a second mediation when all parties oppose it
- 2 Whether declaratory relief can be granted
- 3 How interest should be calculated on sums to be paid (simple or compound)
Ratio Decidendi
It is not appropriate to order a second mediation given parties' opposition, the complexity of the issues, and unresolved funding concerns; all outstanding issues are stood over to a hearing scheduled for 18 April 2006.
Court Disposition
Matter not referred compulsorily to mediation; all outstanding issues stood over to fixture commencing on 18 April 2006.
Orders
- No compulsory mediation ordered.
- Four outstanding issues (declaratory relief, interest, figures for loan accounts, costs) stood over for hearing commencing on 18 April 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment