Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 189

Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 189

The Court ordered that consolidated points of claim in identical form must be filed in both proceedings to ensure clarity in the conduct of the matters, specifying all claims and monetary amounts, and that evidence in one proceeding would be evidence in the other where relevant.

Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Lawrence Lewis; Plaintiff: Lamru Pty Ltd; Defendant: Kation Pty Ltd; Defendant: Peter Lawrence Lewis; Defendant: Mark Lewis; Liquidator: Brian Raymond Silvia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Equity / Directions Hearing
Outcome
Interlocutory directions and orders made
Legal Topics
Supreme Court Procedure, Practice Under Supreme Court Rules, Directions, Statutory Appeal Under the Corporations Act 2001 (cth)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Lawrence Lewis

Plaintiff

Lamru Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Kation Pty Ltd

Defendant

Peter Lawrence Lewis

Defendant

Mark Lewis

Defendant

Brian Raymond Silvia

Liquidator

Procedural Posture

Equity / Directions Hearing

  1. 1 Whether consolidated points of claim in identical form should be filed in two proceedings being heard together, one being a statutory appeal under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Ratio Decidendi

The Court ordered that consolidated points of claim in identical form must be filed in both proceedings to ensure clarity in the conduct of the matters, specifying all claims and monetary amounts, and that evidence in one proceeding would be evidence in the other where relevant.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory directions and orders made

Orders

  • Consolidated points of claim in the same form to be filed in both proceedings by 11 March 2002, stating all claims, monetary amounts, and specifying if any claimed deficiency is to be allowed on statutory appeal.
  • The prayers in the summons to be incorporated in the consolidated points of claim; plaintiff to indicate by 11 March 2002 whether prayers 1 and 2 will be pursued.