Stephens v R (No 2) [2022] NSWCCA 227
The applicant should be sentenced for three counts of child sexual assault consistent with prior indicative sentences, and with a period of imprisonment reflecting the reduced number of proven offences, maintaining the previous ratio between head sentence and non-parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Re Sentencing Following Remittal From the High Court
- Outcome
- Applicant re-sentenced to an aggregate head sentence of imprisonment for 4 years 6 months, commencing on 26 August 2019 and expiring on 25 February 2024, with a non-parole period of 2 years 9 months that expired on 25 May 2022.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'child Sexual Assault' 'appeals' 'remittal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Re Sentencing Following Remittal From the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for three counts of child sexual assault after quashing of other convictions' 'Whether to depart from previous indicative sentences' 'Totality and proportionality in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant should be sentenced for three counts of child sexual assault consistent with prior indicative sentences, and with a period of imprisonment reflecting the reduced number of proven offences, maintaining the previous ratio between head sentence and non-parole period.
Court Disposition
Applicant re-sentenced to an aggregate head sentence of imprisonment for 4 years 6 months, commencing on 26 August 2019 and expiring on 25 February 2024, with a non-parole period of 2 years 9 months that expired on 25 May 2022.
Orders
- ['For count 1, an indicative head sentence of imprisonment for 1 year is recorded.' 'For count 2, an indicative head sentence of imprisonment for 3 years is recorded.' 'For count 3, an indicative head sentence of imprisonment for 3 years is recorded.' 'Applicant sentenced to an aggregate head sentence of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment