Clyne, Peter Leopold v Scott, Eardley Murray & anor [1983] FCA 361

Clyne, Peter Leopold v Scott, Eardley Murray & anor [1983] FCA 361

The preliminary objections to jurisdiction concerning regulation 42, Treasurer's consent, and informant identity fail; regulation 42 prescribes a penalty for purposes of the Banking Act, proceedings may be instituted prior to Treasurer's consent under s.70(3), and no contrary intention appears regarding informant identity under s.13 Crimes Act. The Court declines to intervene on the admissibility of evidence at this stage by applying its discretion.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 December 1983
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs in each case.
Legal Topics
['committal Proceedings' "review of Magistrate's Decision" 'banking (foreign Exchange) Regulations' 'admissibility of Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Application

  1. 1 ['Validity of regulation 42 of Banking (Foreign Exchange) Regulations' "Lack of Treasurer's consent prior to institution of proceedings" 'Identity of informant and proper party' 'Admissibility of confessional material']

Ratio Decidendi

The preliminary objections to jurisdiction concerning regulation 42, Treasurer's consent, and informant identity fail; regulation 42 prescribes a penalty for purposes of the Banking Act, proceedings may be instituted prior to Treasurer's consent under s.70(3), and no contrary intention appears regarding informant identity under s.13 Crimes Act. The Court declines to intervene on the admissibility of evidence at this stage by applying its discretion.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs in each case.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed in each case.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the second respondent, including reserved costs.']