Heywood v Hunters Hill Council [2007] NSWLEC 124
The Court found that DCP 15 permits variations to setback and garden area requirements where the proposal meets the intent of the objectives, and that in this case adequate transition and landscaping were provided, adjoining owners supported the development, and any breach was minor or justified.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter & Marion Heywood; Respondent: Hunters Hill Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Setback Requirements, Garden Area Provisions, Variation of Planning Controls
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter & Marion Heywood
Applicant
Hunters Hill Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether departure from the rear setback requirement can be supported
- 2 Whether departure from the side setback requirement can be supported
- 3 Whether there was a departure from the garden area requirement and if so, whether the departure can be supported
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that DCP 15 permits variations to setback and garden area requirements where the proposal meets the intent of the objectives, and that in this case adequate transition and landscaping were provided, adjoining owners supported the development, and any breach was minor or justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Application 06/1119 for the erection of a vergola at 29 Mortimer Lewis Drive, Huntleys Cove is approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment