McGrath v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 13631 [2022] NSWCATCD 60
Although the Respondent's admitted failure to comply with the orders in SC19/21795 within time established a jurisdictional circumstance under s 237(3)(b), the Tribunal was not satisfied that the discretionary power to appoint a compulsory strata managing agent should be exercised. The proven matters, including delayed compliance, disharmony among lot owners and delay in window cleaning, did not demonstrate that the owners corporation was incapable of performing its responsibilities, dysfunctional, negligent, or that its management should be displaced. Other allegations concerning legal services, levies, finances, mould, lift issues, nesting birds and water ingress were not made out to...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 for Compulsory Appointment of a Strata Managing Agent / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['compulsory Appointment of Strata Managing Agent' 'owners Corporation Management' 'strata Scheme Duties' 'common Property Maintenance' 'legal Services Approval' 'tribunal Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 for Compulsory Appointment of a Strata Managing Agent / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether one or more circumstances in s 237(3) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 were established so as to give the Tribunal jurisdiction to appoint a strata managing agent.' "Whether the owners corporation's management was not functioning or was not functioning satisfactorily." 'Whether the owners corporation failed to comply with a requirement imposed by an order made under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015.' 'Whether the owners corporation failed to perform one or more of its duties, including duties concerning common property maintenance.' 'Whether the Tribunal should exercise its discretion to appoint a compulsory strata managing agent under s 237(1) or s 237(2).']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Respondent's admitted failure to comply with the orders in SC19/21795 within time established a jurisdictional circumstance under s 237(3)(b), the Tribunal was not satisfied that the discretionary power to appoint a compulsory strata managing agent should be exercised. The proven matters, including delayed compliance, disharmony among lot owners and delay in window cleaning, did not demonstrate that the owners corporation was incapable of performing its responsibilities, dysfunctional, negligent, or that its management should be displaced. Other allegations concerning legal services, levies, finances, mould, lift issues, nesting birds and water ingress were not made out to...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for the appointment of a compulsory strata manager under s 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 is dismissed.' 'Any application for costs by the Respondent under s 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 is to be made in the following manner:' 'The respondent is to file and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment