Howard v Senior Constable Risteski [2012] NSWSC 1150
Section 3(2) of the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 did not apply to the Incident Location because Laman Street was not a public thoroughfare at the relevant time, having been lawfully closed under s 115 of the Roads Act 1993. Therefore, Mr Howard was situated on inclosed lands for the purposes of the Act and committed an offence by remaining after being requested to leave.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and penalty confirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Local Court' 'inclosed Lands Protection Act' 'interpretation of Statutory Definitions' 'meaning of Inclosed Lands' 'temporary Road Closure' 'barriers and Fencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Magistrate erred in law in holding that plaintiff was on inclosed lands' 'Applicability of s 3(2) of the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901' 'Whether plaintiff was situated on a road for purposes of s 3(2) of the Act' 'Effect of temporary closure of road and erection of fencing on legal status of land']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 3(2) of the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 did not apply to the Incident Location because Laman Street was not a public thoroughfare at the relevant time, having been lawfully closed under s 115 of the Roads Act 1993. Therefore, Mr Howard was situated on inclosed lands for the purposes of the Act and committed an offence by remaining after being requested to leave.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction and penalty confirmed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' 'Conviction and penalty confirmed' 'No order as to costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment