Walker re One.Tel Limited [2007] NSWSC 1478
Customer credits in One.Tel accounts, whether arising before or after the 'relevant date' but referable to pre-liquidation contracts with subscribers, are provable debts in the winding up under s 553(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Such debts and claims do not fall into the statutory priority categories; they rank equally with other unsecured creditor claims. Invalid credits are not provable at all. The temporal link required is the pre-liquidation contract, not the timing of payment or breach.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Winding Up Application / Application by Liquidators for Directions Under S 511(1)(a) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
- Outcome
- Liquidators directed to submit form of direction reflecting the court's conclusions.
- Legal Topics
- ['proof and Ranking of Claims' 'provable Debts' 'customer Credits' 'winding Up Procedure' 'priority of Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up Application / Application by Liquidators for Directions Under S 511(1)(a) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether customer account credit balances (especially those arising after the 'relevant date') are provable debts in the winding up under s 553(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)" 'Whether such claims fall within priority categories under s 556(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether liquidators should take active steps in relation to small customer credit balances']
Ratio Decidendi
Customer credits in One.Tel accounts, whether arising before or after the 'relevant date' but referable to pre-liquidation contracts with subscribers, are provable debts in the winding up under s 553(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Such debts and claims do not fall into the statutory priority categories; they rank equally with other unsecured creditor claims. Invalid credits are not provable at all. The temporal link required is the pre-liquidation contract, not the timing of payment or breach.
Court Disposition
Liquidators directed to submit form of direction reflecting the court's conclusions.
Orders
- ['Liquidators to submit for consideration the precise form of direction they seek in light of the judgment.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment