Covington-Thomas v Cth of Australia [No 3] [2007] NSWSC 1062

Covington-Thomas v Cth of Australia [No 3] [2007] NSWSC 1062

The plaintiff's offer of compromise was reasonable in the circumstances and not accepted; the verdict was significantly more favourable to the plaintiff, warranting indemnity costs from the relevant date, including provision for Senior Counsel and two Juniors due to the case's complexity. Interest on the costs should accrue 28 days after serving a bill of costs. A stay is granted subject to the defendant lodging an appeal promptly and paying $750,000 to the plaintiff's solicitors within 28 days.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 September 2007
Procedural Posture
Negligence Claim for Damages / Post Verdict Applications for Costs, Interest on Costs, Provision for Additional Counsel, and Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Applications granted in favour of plaintiff, orders made for indemnity costs, provision for Senior Counsel and two Juniors, interest on costs, and conditional stay.
Legal Topics
['offer of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs' 'interest on Costs' 'stay Pending Appeal']
['negligence' 'costs' 'civil Procedure'] ['offer of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs' 'interest on Costs' 'stay Pending Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Negligence Claim for Damages / Post Verdict Applications for Costs, Interest on Costs, Provision for Additional Counsel, and Stay Pending Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to indemnity costs following an offer of compromise' 'Whether costs should include Senior Counsel and two Juniors' "Whether interest should accrue on the plaintiff's costs from 28 days after filing and serving a bill of costs for assessment" 'Whether a stay of orders should be granted and on what conditions']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's offer of compromise was reasonable in the circumstances and not accepted; the verdict was significantly more favourable to the plaintiff, warranting indemnity costs from the relevant date, including provision for Senior Counsel and two Juniors due to the case's complexity. Interest on the costs should accrue 28 days after serving a bill of costs. A stay is granted subject to the defendant lodging an appeal promptly and paying $750,000 to the plaintiff's solicitors within 28 days.

Court Disposition

Applications granted in favour of plaintiff, orders made for indemnity costs, provision for Senior Counsel and two Juniors, interest on costs, and conditional stay.

Orders

  • ['Indemnity costs in favour of the plaintiff from 13/10/06 in accordance with Pt 42 r 42.14(2), including provision for Senior Counsel and two Juniors.' "Interest should accrue on the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed from 28 days after the filing and serving of a bill of costs for assessment." "A stay of the...