Transport for NSW & Ors v Robinson [2018] NSWCATAP 123
The Appeal Panel found that the Tribunal below erred in law by adding an unwarranted requirement to cl 2(1)(e) of Schedule 1 of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) that Cabinet must actually have deliberated or decided upon the matter for the information to be exempt, and similarly erred regarding application of legal professional privilege and waiver. Consequently, access to the relevant documents should be refused.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Transport for NSW; Second Appellant: Roads and Maritime Services; Third Respondent: Premier of NSW; Respondent: Peter Robinson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, leave to appeal granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Government Information, Cabinet Confidentiality, Legal Professional Privilege, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transport for NSW
First Appellant
Roads and Maritime Services
Second Appellant
Premier of NSW
Third Respondent
Peter Robinson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of cl 2(1)(e) of Sch 1 to the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) relating to Cabinet information
- 2 Application of legal professional privilege and waiver under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and common law
- 3 Whether Tribunal below erred in applying test for Cabinet information and privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel found that the Tribunal below erred in law by adding an unwarranted requirement to cl 2(1)(e) of Schedule 1 of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) that Cabinet must actually have deliberated or decided upon the matter for the information to be exempt, and similarly erred regarding application of legal professional privilege and waiver. Consequently, access to the relevant documents should be refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, leave to appeal granted in part
Orders
- Parties to confer within 7 days and file consent or competing orders; supporting submissions not to exceed three pages.
- Leave to appeal granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment