Chesher v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 132
The Court holds that the existence of a public tender and exclusive waste services contract does not remove its power to determine a s 68 application for effluent waste disposal approval; Council’s service and regulatory approval functions are separate under the Local Government Act 1993. Whether approval should be...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Appeal (planning and Environment) / Interlocutory Judgment; Final Orders Reserved Pending Further Submissions
- Outcome
- Determination of the s 68 approval application reserved; parties directed to make further submissions regarding possible conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['waste Disposal Approvals' 'council Regulatory and Service Functions' 'tendering Under Local Government Act' 'public Interest Considerations' 'ecologically Sustainable Development']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Appeal (planning and Environment) / Interlocutory Judgment; Final Orders Reserved Pending Further Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court has power to consider a s 68 application to dispose of effluent waste if a tender process has occurred under the Local Government Act 1993' 'Whether, in the exercise of discretion under s 89, the approval should be granted given public interest considerations']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court holds that the existence of a public tender and exclusive waste services contract does not remove its power to determine a s 68 application for effluent waste disposal approval; Council’s service and regulatory approval functions are separate under the Local Government Act 1993. Whether approval should be granted in the exercise of discretion turns on the compatibility of Applicants’ objectives with the public interest, and cannot be decided without further submissions on appropriate conditions to address environmental and public health concerns.
Court Disposition
Determination of the s 68 approval application reserved; parties directed to make further submissions regarding possible conditions.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment