SAGE v R [2007] NSWCCA 224
Specific deterrence was properly considered because the psychological and pre-sentence material, together with the applicant's evidence about the diary entries, left open a risk of re-offending. The individual and aggregate sentences were within the sentencing judge's discretion and were not manifestly excessive given the maximum penalties, comparable sentences, and warranted partial accumulation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offences Against Children Committed Outside Australia' 'specific Deterrence' 'manifest Excess' 'guilty Pleas' 'totality']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge placed undue weight on specific deterrence in imposing sentence.' 'Whether the aggregate sentence and non-parole period were manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
Specific deterrence was properly considered because the psychological and pre-sentence material, together with the applicant's evidence about the diary entries, left open a risk of re-offending. The individual and aggregate sentences were within the sentencing judge's discretion and were not manifestly excessive given the maximum penalties, comparable sentences, and warranted partial accumulation.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment