Sandilands v Registrar Parkyn [2025] FCA 41

The applicant's proposed challenge to the Registrar's decision lacked any merit, failed to identify grounds for review, was formally deficient, and was frivolous and vexatious with no reasonable prospect of success; thus, extension of time must be refused.

Parties: Applicant: Peter Sandilands; Respondent: Registrar Nic Parkyn
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 05 February 2025
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Time to Seek Judicial Review / Judgment on Papers
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Frivolous and Vexatious Litigation, Registrar's Powers, Judicial Review

Practice and Procedure Extension of Time Frivolous and Vexatious Litigation Registrar's Powers Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Peter Sandilands

Applicant

Registrar Nic Parkyn

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Seek Judicial Review / Judgment on Papers

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant can obtain an extension of time to review the Registrar's decision under r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
2 Whether the documents sought to be filed are frivolous and vexatious
3 Jurisdiction of the Court to review decisions of the Registrar

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Registry directed not to accept the applicant's application for an extension of time filed on 19 September 2024
Application for extension of time to challenge the Respondent's 13 October 2023 decision is dismissed