Nelson v Thompson [2021] FCA 1055
Given the respondent’s non-opposition, the complexities surrounding what constitutes a provable debt in cases alleging professional negligence, and the advanced state and circumstances of the existing proceedings, leave under s 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) should be granted to the applicant to continue and take fresh steps in the Supreme Court of Western Australia proceeding against Mr Thompson, subject to specified conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave Regarding Steps in Proceedings Involving a Bankrupt Respondent / Determination of Application for Leave Under S 58(3) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (cth)
- Outcome
- Application allowed; leave to continue proceedings granted, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Proceed Against Bankrupt' 'provable Debt' 'professional Negligence' 'breach of Contract by Solicitor']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave Regarding Steps in Proceedings Involving a Bankrupt Respondent / Determination of Application for Leave Under S 58(3) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under s 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to continue and take fresh steps in proceedings against a bankrupt solicitor' "Whether the applicant's claims are in respect of 'provable debts' under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the respondent’s non-opposition, the complexities surrounding what constitutes a provable debt in cases alleging professional negligence, and the advanced state and circumstances of the existing proceedings, leave under s 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) should be granted to the applicant to continue and take fresh steps in the Supreme Court of Western Australia proceeding against Mr Thompson, subject to specified conditions.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; leave to continue proceedings granted, subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave (to the extent necessary) to continue and take fresh steps in Supreme Court proceedings CIV 2404 of 2015 against Jarrod Thompson.' "The leave is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking within 14 days: (a) not to seek final relief without giving seven days'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment