Tagget v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 109
The appellant's receipt of the parcel of land in 2005 was consideration for services rendered and constitutes ordinary income derived in the 2005/2006 taxation year; the money value of the land must be determined as at the time it is paid or given, not at the time when a conditional right was acquired. The appeal is dismissed because the primary judge's assessment was correct under the applicable legislation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Single Judge Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['income Tax' 'assessment of Non Cash Business Benefits' 'timing and Valuation of Income' 'remuneration for Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Single Judge Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether land transferred to the appellant constituted ordinary income within the meaning of s 6-5(2) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth)' 'Whether the land should be valued as at the date the appellant acquired a conditional right to the land or as at the date of the actual transfer']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's receipt of the parcel of land in 2005 was consideration for services rendered and constitutes ordinary income derived in the 2005/2006 taxation year; the money value of the land must be determined as at the time it is paid or given, not at the time when a conditional right was acquired. The appeal is dismissed because the primary judge's assessment was correct under the applicable legislation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment