R v Peter Tsallas [2017] NSWSC 64

R v Peter Tsallas [2017] NSWSC 64

The applicant failed to discharge the onus of showing cause, as required by s 16B of the Bail Act 2013. The factors relied upon by the applicant were not considered sufficient, given the seriousness of the offences and the strength of the Crown case, to justify granting bail.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Decision on Bail
Outcome
Bail refused
Legal Topics
['bail' 'sexual Offences' 'show Cause Requirement']
['criminal Law'] ['bail' 'sexual Offences' 'show Cause Requirement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bail Application / Decision on Bail

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant has shown cause why his continued detention is not justified under s 16B of the Bail Act 2013']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to discharge the onus of showing cause, as required by s 16B of the Bail Act 2013. The factors relied upon by the applicant were not considered sufficient, given the seriousness of the offences and the strength of the Crown case, to justify granting bail.

Court Disposition

Bail refused

Orders

  • ['Bail is refused.']