R v Cook; Twigg, Ex p [1980] HCA 36
The conviction and fine imposed on Mr. Twigg by the Family Court for contempt were unsustainable in law as the conduct alleged did not amount to contempt under the Family Law Act, and there was no admissible evidence to support the conviction. Certiorari was appropriate to quash the conviction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writs (prohibition, Certiorari) / High Court Original Jurisdiction, Order Nisi Return
- Outcome
- Order nisi for certiorari made absolute; order nisi for prohibition discharged; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'jurisdiction' 'certiorari' 'prohibition' 'natural Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Writs (prohibition, Certiorari) / High Court Original Jurisdiction, Order Nisi Return
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to convict Mr. Twigg for contempt not committed in the face of the court' 'Whether the conduct alleged amounted to contempt of court under the Family Law Act 1975' 'Whether the evidence before the Family Court supported the conviction' 'Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to issue certiorari in these circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction and fine imposed on Mr. Twigg by the Family Court for contempt were unsustainable in law as the conduct alleged did not amount to contempt under the Family Law Act, and there was no admissible evidence to support the conviction. Certiorari was appropriate to quash the conviction.
Court Disposition
Order nisi for certiorari made absolute; order nisi for prohibition discharged; no order as to costs
Orders
- ['Conviction and fine of $1,000 against Mr. Twigg quashed by certiorari' "No order as to costs; Solicitor-General undertook to pay applicant's costs"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment